![]() messy, to say the least.Īnd, as mentioned by it doesn't help that the global search & replace functionality was removed, too.Įxercise to the reader: write your own GitHub action to replace the variables above. So, in essence, you could simply write your own test suite from scratch - instead of relying on Postman - since the amount of time required for writing code in Postman is essentially the same as writing a test suite in it also means figuring out how someone did it on one particular Postman API (assuming they have provided their JavaScript with the rest of the API) in order to adapt to one's own environment (as explained so well - sometimes, 'common' variable names have been used for different purposes, and it's up to the Postman user to fix all those references when merging different APIs together). In other words: setting up a quick & dirty test suite inside Postman - which is an excellent tool for that! - due to the lack of propagating things like the base URL, version, etc. I found the option was created to run newman with docker image and postman collection on MAC by running the following docker pull postman/newmanubuntu1404 docker run -t postman/newmanubuntu1404. which should be doing exactly that kind of work for us! ![]() I find it amusing that one needs to programmatically construct the various components of an API call inside Postman. This thread is already half a decade old, but nevertheless still relevant. If I'm trying to document or mock up an API with several hundred calls, this one feature could save me enormous amounts of time. While I realize we can currently use variables to simulate this behavior, that is more cumbersome than being able to set a default and allowing an overriding value where necessary. In each request, I obviously have the option of overriding it. ![]() Likewise, it would not be difficult to have an option to allow me to specify a default base URL for a collection. The simplest example is creating a collection with no authorization, then adding it to the specific calls which require it. In each individual request, I have the option of overriding the authorization regime, or removing it entirely. If I do, that regime is, BY DEFAULT, propagated to any requests created in the collection. The comment posted by logiclabs gets this job done, and conforms to other behaviors already found in Postman.įor example, when creating a collection, I have the option of setting an authorization regime. We recommend using collection level variables and setting variables manually for requests as Postman can't assume that one baseURL applies to each I think you misunderstand the feature request.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |